Dick Turpin: www.librosmaravillosos.com, accessed 30 August 2013. |
Horse theft in
the early modern period is generally associated with men and was characterized
in the eighteenth century by the activities of men such as Dick Turpin. Women were only occasionally
charged with horse theft, although
it is possible that women acted as ‘fences’ for stolen livestock or took care
of the animals until they could be passed on.[1]
Steps in following a capital offence
through the legal process: the case of Ann Taylor,
alias Ann Taverley, alias Ann Nightingale, 1753.
1. Examination by a magistrate of the accused, the victim
and any witnesses.
Deposition/Examination – North Riding, Yorkshire 14 June 1753.[2]
Ann Nightingale, daughter of Robert Nightingale of Yearsley
Theft of a mare from Edward Jobson of
Heverstough, Lincolnshire
This Examinant saith and deposeth that
this black mare was left for her with Mr John Brady Inn Keeper of Great Grimsby
in the county of Lincoln by Jeremiah Taylor, saylor where she received her
about twelve or thirteen weeks since of the said Mr Brady and paid him one
Guinea for the keeping of the said mare and rode upon the same to Tipsthorpe in
the East Riding of Yorkshire from whence she was brought by her order to Whenby
in the North Riding of Yorkshire by John Weddell Overseer of the poor of Whenby
aforesaid.
Other statements in this series include:
Information of John Gibson of Wass, Kilburn, North Riding re theft of his bay mare on 21 March 1750 by Ann Nightingale who sold it on to Hannah Hollings.
Information of Edward Jobson of
Heverstough, Lincolnshire re theft of a black mare out of its stable 15 March
1753.
Information of Francis Richardson of
Ryland Abby, Coxwould, North Riding re theft of his saddle five years ago that
was later found with Ann Nightingale.
Information of William Skleton of
Yearsley, Coxwould, North Riding re theft of a dark grey mare in March 1751.[3]
3.
Verdict of the petty jury.
Ann was sentenced to death
at the Summer Assizes for the county in July 1753.[5]
5. Response of the king via the secretary of state.
Following the assize sessions for Yorkshire, presided over by
Serjeant Eyre, Baron Legge and Justice Clive, a circuit memorial recommended
Ann Taylor inter alia as ‘a fit
object of mercy’. Ann’s sentence was commuted to transportation to America for
fourteen years in June 1754. Even though Ann would have served at least one
year served in gaol pending her trial and reprieve, there would be no remission
in the term of years to be served in America.[7]
Unusually, TNA ASSI 45 includes a list
of costs in this case and provides evidence of the use of legal counsel by the
prosecutor in this case. Until the mid-eighteenth century, prosecution costs
were recoverable only from the defendant but following an Act of 1752 costs
were recoverable from the crown. However, the estreat process enabled the crown to attempt to recoup the costs
from a convicted prisoner.[8]
The King v Ann Nightingale.
For Horse stealing on the prosecution of
William Skelton, Castle of York – Summer Assizes 1753.
Paid Clerk of Assizes for drawing the Indictment
|
2s
|
Paid for swearing
|
2s
|
Paid for subpoena
|
2s 6d
|
Paid John Smith a witness for coming 25 miles
|
10s 6d
|
Expenses
|
10s
|
Drawing a Brief
|
5s
|
Fair copy for Council
|
5s
|
Fee to him
|
10s 6d
|
To Mr Graves the Attorney
|
6s 8d
|
£2 14s 2d
| |
15s 6d
| |
Allowed
|
£1 18s 8d
|
A wide ranging survey of trial outcomes for
capital offences in England and Wales (1735-1799) by Richard Clark and Dave
Mossop demonstrates that while few women were convicted of horse theft, those
that were could not be assured of a reprieve from execution.
Female executions 1735 – 1799, England and
Wales.[9]
Crime
|
Total
|
%
|
Horse/sheep theft
|
5
|
1.41
|
Total
|
355
|
100.00
|
Date
|
Name
|
Place
|
Method
|
Crime
|
29 August 1740
|
Martha Allen
|
Exeter
(Heavitree)
|
Hanged
with 2 men
|
Horse theft
|
5 August 1785
|
Mary Morgan
|
Gloucester
|
Hanged with 1 man
|
Horse theft
|
28 April 1791
|
Catherine Lloyd
|
Cardigan
|
Hanged
|
Horse theft
|
It is possible that some victims of horse theft failed to prosecute and were satisfied by the retrieval of their property, although they may have been more vigilant in the prosecution of organised crime associated with gangs of horse rustlers.
By the way:
When
Joan of Arc was tried in Rouen by an ecclesiastical court in 1430, the 70
charges against her ranged from sorcery to horse theft. They were later
whittled down to twelve charges, mainly relating to her wearing of men’s
clothing and claims that God had directly spoken to her.[10]
If you have enjoyed reading this blog, please follow me using the link on right-hand panel.
If you have enjoyed reading this blog, please follow me using the link on right-hand panel.
[1] Edwards, Peter (1988) The Horse Trade of Tudor and Stuart England, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 168.
[2] The National Archives (TNA) ASSI 45.
[3] See http://c18thgirl.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/horse-thieves-part-2-recording-data.html, on horse fairs and data gathering.
[4] Not located: it should have filed in TNA ASSI 44.
[5] TNA ASSI 42.
[6] TNA ASSI 42.
[7] TNA SP 44, circuit memorial; TNA ASSI 42.
[8] 25 Geo. II c.36 (1752) An Act for better preventing Thefts and Robberies, allowed prosecution costs to be paid in the case of a successful conviction for felony.
[9] Clark, Richard (2013) ‘Female executions 1735 – 1799’ (data collection Dave Mossop) http://www.capitalpunishmentuk.org/fem1735.html, accessed 19 August 2013.
[10] Cohen, Jennie (2012) ‘7 Things You Didn’t Know About Joan of Arc’, http://www.history.com/news/7-things-you-didnt-know-about-joan-of-arc, accessed 19 August 2013.
Since writing this blog I came across the word 'Feague' - a term from around the 18th century that means to put a live eel up a horse's bottom. Apparently, this was a horse dealer's trick to make an old horse seem more lively.
ReplyDelete